View Poll Results: Which monitor? | |||
Dell IPS | 12 | 100.00% | |
Viewsonic VX | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
05-09-2012, 08:53 PM | #1 |
Major General
3666
Rep 9,783
Posts |
IPS monitors vs TN monitors
I'm building a desktop so I'm buying all the parts as I go along. I came across a Dell U2412M Ultrasharp monitor for $299 and was wondering if it's worth the price difference. Below are the monitors that I'm choosing from. I'm looking mainly for a good monitor for photos, maybe some video editing, surfing the web, watching movies and maybe a game here and there. Thanks!
Dell U2412M- $299 + tax Viewsonic VX2453MH-LED- $199 |
05-09-2012, 08:59 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
530
Rep 1,506
Posts |
Asus or Sceptre would be my first choices.
__________________
miiipilot
'24 M2 Brooklyn Grey, 6mt, Bi-Color, Black M-Color seats, '16 MG M2, DCT, Exec. Took Delivery 4/30/16 (Sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2012, 11:31 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
1985
Rep 4,230
Posts
Drives: BMW G80 M3
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PA, USA
|
I like IPS monitors because of their unlimited viewing angles. For photo editing it is convenient to not have to worry about whether the monitor is tilted. Also nice if a bunch of people are looking at the monitor - everybody's going to be seeing the same picture.
Some of the cheaper ones still suffer from color shift though (all probably do to an extent). Dell sells pretty good monitors, I have good experiences with the Ultrasharp. Currently I have the HP Dreamcolor IPS but that is much more expensive than the models you're looking at. No experience with the Viewsonic.
__________________
2024 BMW M3 Sedan Frozen Pure Grey II/Fjord Blue, 6MT
Past: 2021 Z4 M40i Frozen Grey II/Black Alcantara | 2017 F30 340i Mineral Gray/Coral Red, 6MT | 2011 E92 335i Le Mans Blue/Black, 6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2012, 12:24 AM | #5 | |
Lieutenant
41
Rep 530
Posts |
Quote:
With TN as you look from the top of the monitor to the bottom, the colors on the screen changes. TN is good for cheap gaming monitors, but not good for photo processing or even reading documents. That's a really sweet deal for 24" IPS monitor. I have a 22" Dell e-IPS from a year ago and a 17" Ultrasharp from 2003 that still works fine. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2012, 12:27 AM | #6 |
Captain
26
Rep 770
Posts |
IPS has much better viewing angles and color reproduction, BUT there is also the sparkle/grain issue. In regions of pure white (or light colors), IPS monitors will exhibit a grain or sparkle due to the anti-reflective coating on most IPS monitors. The only IPS monitors that don't have this are the glossy ones (mainly Apple desktop displays). Some very high-end matte ones also have minimum sparkle (NEC pro line).
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2012, 11:46 AM | #7 |
Nigerian Prince
400
Rep 2,180
Posts
Drives: '11 F25
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
|
If a 24" UltraSharp monitor costs $299, its probably not all that ultra sharp to begin with.
Dell has 20% sale on their monitors every couple of months. You may want to wait and buy one of these instead of the cheap one. Also, their cheaper monitors are not height adjustable and do not rotate. http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/p...n&sku=320-8277 That said, I sold my Dell monitor and got an Apple Thunderbolt display. Now THAT is a nice monitor.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2012, 02:01 PM | #8 |
Brigadier General
425
Rep 3,287
Posts |
There are a few monitors and general notes I'd like to make.
Dell U2412m: Display type: e-IPs Benefit: Produces less heat with a thinner overall display while maintaining near full IPS colors and performance. Cheaper, almost half the price. Detriment: Colors may not be quite as good, fewer filters. Dell U2410 Display type: H-IPs Benefit: Better color gradients. Detriment: Thicker display, more heat, higher price. HP LP2475w Display type: S-IPs Benefit: Good color gradients. Detriment: Thicker display, more heat, higher price. HP ZR2440w Display type: e-IPs Benefit: Low heat, thinner, Cheaper. Detriment: Lower color gradients and accuracy. The reduced heat output sounds like not a big deal, but it is actually pretty incredible. I have both a U2410 and a HP ZR2440w at work side by side and the Dell get HOT and stays hot all day. The HP under the same usage only ever feels slightly warm, not even fully warm. I haven't seen or read any particular reason to avoid e-IPS. You might not have quite as clear gradients, however for half the price you are certainly getting well more than half the monitor. If under your own research you decide you don't want an e-IPS display, then the older more expensive Dell U2410 and HP LP2475w would be fine. But these are $600 monitors. If all you are doing is gaming, you may want just a simple TN panel. TN panels can have higher performance than any IPS and overall are significantly cheaper.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2012, 02:08 PM | #10 |
Captain
26
Rep 770
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-11-2012, 05:25 AM | #11 |
Major General
3666
Rep 9,783
Posts |
Thanks guys! I read some reviews on the Dell and they do have the "dirty screeN" look due to the anti-glare coating. I'm already pushing my budget (about $200-300 over) so I'm just gonna go with the Viewsonic for now and then get a nice IPS later for a dual-monitor setup.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2012, 01:08 AM | #12 |
Brigadier General
425
Rep 3,287
Posts |
That's wrong...
The Dell 2408WFP, predecessor to the U2410, was released Dec. 2007 as a 2008 model. (2408WFP) U2410 was released in Sept. 2009 as a 2010 model. (Hence U2410) The schedule for the U2412m makes it officially a pattern.
__________________
Last edited by UltimateBMW; 05-12-2012 at 01:13 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|