03-16-2011, 08:11 PM | #1 |
Free Thinker
19340
Rep 7,552
Posts |
Lovin' the 10-22mm.
What a lens.
And without a hood and the sun in the image, I had just the tiniest bit of flare which was a snap to remove.
__________________
Last edited by M_Six; 03-16-2011 at 10:04 PM.. |
03-16-2011, 08:29 PM | #2 |
General
1584
Rep 29,215
Posts |
Yup, I'm very happy with my 10-22 too.
__________________
F10 520d M-Sport Alpine White | HRE P43SC 20x9+20x11 | Michelin PSS 255/35+295/30 | KW V3 Coilover | M5 Front Sway Bar + M550d Rear Sway Bar | 3DDesign Front Lip | BMW M Performance CF Spoiler | BMW M Performance Diffuser | BMW M Performance Black Grills | BMW M Performance Pedals | |
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2011, 12:02 AM | #3 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1247
Rep 1,598
Posts |
Me 3!
__________________
- Jeff
bosstones' flickr |
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2011, 02:30 PM | #4 |
Major General
708
Rep 5,382
Posts |
cool lens, makes the sky look awesome! i miss my wide angle
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2011, 02:43 PM | #5 |
Free Thinker
19340
Rep 7,552
Posts |
That's the thing about it being so damn flat here. The sky seems enormous. Yesterday with the clouds and the blue sky, it was good to get as much as possible in the pic. When the sky is flat gray, it sux trying to keep from overwhelming the image with the dullness of it.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2011, 05:15 PM | #6 |
Major General
153
Rep 6,603
Posts
Drives: e92 335i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Cal
|
nice shots
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2011, 07:05 PM | #7 |
Brigadier General
246
Rep 3,019
Posts |
Very nice, I love wide - here's some from my Sigma 8-16 at 8mm on a Nikon D200. Utterly delighted with it and lots cheaper than anything comparable from Nikon.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2011, 09:37 PM | #8 |
Private First Class
13
Rep 102
Posts |
Nice pics! Are you using a circular polarizer? I noticed that your pics will have a nicely exposed area of the clouds and then it gets really dark. This is way too common when using a circular polarizer on a wide angle. Use a GND filter instead. But the problem is they are hard to come by.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2011, 09:45 PM | #9 | |
Free Thinker
19340
Rep 7,552
Posts |
Quote:
I have a CPL for my 55-250mm, but not for the 10-22mm. I'll look for an ND and a GND for that, though, as I'll probably be shooting a lot of pics with a horizon.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2011, 11:17 PM | #10 |
The Photographer
83
Rep 628
Posts |
I loved my 10-22 when I had my 40D!!!
__________________
John Batte Photography / Flickr / Facebook 2007 ///M Coupe BSM/Black Extended/Loaded | RPi GT Exhaust w/custom gloss black tips | KW V3 | Michelin PSS 245/265 | Pinnacle F1 Tint 35% | ZHP Shift Knob |
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2011, 07:18 AM | #11 |
Colonel
60
Rep 2,402
Posts |
I've got the tamron 10-24 absolutely love it! Can't beat a bit of WA.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2011, 03:21 PM | #13 |
Major General
1298
Rep 7,389
Posts |
Great shots. Are they full frame or crop-sensor.
I'm jonesing for Canon's new EF 8-15mm f/4L Fisheye USM Fisheye Ultra-Wide Zoom Lens. Hopefully the earthquake and tsunami want delay it too, too long. My 24-105mm is great on my full-frame 5D MkII, but even wider looks mighty good. That's a whole new perspective. Dave
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2011, 08:23 PM | #14 | |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
Quote:
the 16-37 is on my 5D a majority of the time now. I don`t find i need to be much closer then 35mm ever anymore. Took some getting used to. love the extra exposier i can get with the wide angle too. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2011, 08:53 PM | #15 |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
this is probably about a 17 crop factor because it was a little crooked, and i fixed that issue.
to those out there with crop bodies, this would be equivilent to you shooting 10-11mm |
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2011, 10:55 PM | #16 |
Ikea enthusiast
342
Rep 8,140
Posts
Drives: '07 E92 335i
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Definitely a fun lens, 10mm opens up a new world of options.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2011, 11:09 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant Colonel
512
Rep 1,572
Posts
Drives: 2013 LRP M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Quincy, MA
|
looking good!!
I had a 10-22 a few years back when I had a 20D.. i used it on my 5D for a while as well until I bought a 17-40.. It will work on the 5D if you yank the black plastic ring out (takes like 2 secs).. and it snaps back in like it was meant to come out lulz.. It worked down to 14mm, below that and it would start to vignette. i wish I had kept it because I could sure use it now for rig shots with my Sony NEX-5 without risking damage to my mofo cameras.. --mike |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2011, 01:14 AM | #18 | |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2011, 09:18 AM | #19 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
It's because of the crop factor difference... basically went to general super-wide-angle lens to a fisheye. Same thing happens with the new EF 8-15mm f/4L lens.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|