01-27-2011, 11:19 AM | #1 |
Private
18
Rep 70
Posts |
Trade in for M3 or IS-F
Hey Guys-
I been thinking about trading in my E92 for either a 1. 08' E90 M3 (40k-50K) 2. 08' IS-F (40k-50K) I been doing a lot of research but I am favor the IS-F due to the lower cost of ownership and less headache down the road on maintenance if I keep the car for more than 4 years. The M3 is a one amazing car to own. This is a tough choice. Any insight is helpful. |
01-27-2011, 11:26 AM | #2 |
Brigadier General
429
Rep 4,709
Posts |
If cost of ownership is indeed one of your main concerns, I would go for the IS-F. I'm not sure about being comparable to an IS-F, but an '08 M3 will be out of warranty within the next year and you'll have to start paying the maintenence costs which can add up.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 12:06 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant Colonel
107
Rep 1,552
Posts
Drives: '19 M2C | '20 100AE ND2
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Phx, AZ
|
M3.
I couldn't live with myself if I drove something as ugly as an IS-F, and I drive a 1 series.
__________________
2019 M2C - Alpine White - 6MT
2023 Supra 6MT - Deposit and Wait |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 12:15 PM | #4 |
derp
51
Rep 1,203
Posts |
Honestly, I'd take the M3. IS-F might not be that much cheaper to maintain. Yeah it's Japanese, but it's a Lexus. Have you looked into extended warranties at all? Good luck
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 12:18 PM | #5 |
Major General
4459
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Pass on the used IS-F, they made a ton of suspension changes for 2011 that make it fairly competitive to the M3, performance wise, but the earlier cars had a punishing ride with no real benefit and aren't nearly as capable as the 2011's or an E9x M3.
Since you're interested in low maintenance and are considering automatics, why not consider the C63 too? |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 12:26 PM | #6 |
Major
57
Rep 1,175
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 12:27 PM | #7 |
Registered Sex Offender
617
Rep 4,757
Posts |
I don't know why anyone would even consider the IS-F's before this new one came out. If you can live with an automatic, I'd go for the C63. Holy shit, what a car.
__________________
Stop putting stuff like painted reflectors and premium package in your signature. You're embarrassing.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 12:33 PM | #8 |
derp
51
Rep 1,203
Posts |
lol Lexus would find a way to jack up the costs.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 01:40 PM | #9 |
Brigadier General
167
Rep 4,013
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 02:28 PM | #12 |
First Lieutenant
101
Rep 346
Posts |
Honestly neither. I feel they're both overpriced. The m3's performance is marginally better then a 335 for street use, and costs a whole bunch more dough. The is-f is a nice car but I just couldn't justify spending that much on it. I agree with the other member c63>both. Depending on how bad u really need those back seats, I think a used c6 z06, or used 2010 gt500 triumphs both those cars in performance if you care to give them a shot. I would also be willing to bet a lot of money both would be funner while doing the damn thing too. But another thing to remember is this is your car. Not anyone elses. You have to do what makes you happy at the end of the day. If you've driven both and the Is-f gets your blood pumping more then the M3 then that's what you should get.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 03:04 PM | #13 |
Colonel
69
Rep 2,352
Posts
Drives: IS 300
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bradenton FL
|
Bashing lexus again... HAHA.. If u don't want a headache, get a lexus...
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Speed never killed anyone its very important to get that straight, Speed has never killed a soul. Suddenly becoming stationary thats what gets people." - Jeremy Clarkson |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 03:13 PM | #14 |
Major
45
Rep 1,011
Posts |
OP wanted a lowe maintenance vehicle... or so i understood. c63 has high maintenance cost. Being a MB that is expected but even for a normal C class its $450 minium for Service A and $550+/- for Service B.
AMG cars dont go through the same routine and costs more due to AMG certified tech touches the car and has more service intervals. and if you do not go to a MB dealer to get the maintenance done, your CPO warranty is gone. and if that is gone, there is no point in spending that much money for some part that fails... and yes MB parts fail... fail more than others. especially MAF sensor, control arm bushings prematurely, electrical issues common with euros. i too have considered this before i got married last year. and if you can find a ISF for less than 37k i think its pretty good. and i believe 09 and up has actual LSD instead of electronic ones. but if its power in sedan form... i would also consider CTSV for the power per dollar , maintenance costs, and if you can drive a domestic with z06 LS7 engine.
__________________
driving is poetry in motion. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 04:25 PM | #15 | |
The power of V!
103
Rep 1,971
Posts
Drives: 2007 335i coupe steptronic
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1998 Lexus Gs400 [0.00]
2010 ebony & ivory [0.00] 2006 BMW X3 [0.00] 2009 pics [0.00] 2009 e92 335 xdrive [0.00] |
Quote:
__________________
2007 335 coupe Alpine white, steptronic, sportpack, etc. (gone)
2006 X3 3.0 steptronic Titanium Silver, 2009 E92 335xdrive, next.... Caddy CTS_V! 13 Lincoln MKZ? hmmm. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 04:45 PM | #16 |
Captain
28
Rep 805
Posts
Drives: 2011 Z4 35is Melbourne Red
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portland, OR
|
After owning an IS350 there is not a chance I would touch the IS-F. We had more trouble with ours than any BMW we have owned. Lexus service is not up to BMW standards (at least at our local Lexus dealer).
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 05:05 PM | #17 |
Been There, Done That.
708
Rep 4,728
Posts |
I'd get a 2010 or above MY because it comes with a mechanical LSD.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 06:49 PM | #18 | |
Colonel
127
Rep 2,312
Posts |
Quote:
High performance cars have tighter tolerances, making them a pain to maintain. Doesn't matter whether you're Lexus or BMW. High performance costs money. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 07:50 PM | #19 |
Major General
443
Rep 6,967
Posts |
For every horrible story there's also story of satisfied customer. I came from a 135i to a IS350, from a lemon to a car with zero problem, and with high probability my next car will be another Lexus, Nissan or Porsche.
Guarantee there's a contradictory story going from Lexus to BMW. However these are anecdotal experience, looking at reliability from afar Lexus ranks higher repeatedly year over year than BMW. Like anything in life some sacrifice is going to be made going from one choice to another. If BMW is perfect on all fronts then Lexus won't exist today. I would trade 08 M3 to a 10 ISF but not a 08 ISF without the diff and new suspension tunes.
__________________
- There's nothing in my pocket other than knives and lint
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 09:00 PM | #20 |
Colonel
156
Rep 2,368
Posts |
Lexus for reliability.
The new ISF can keep up with a M3 on the track and take it on the drag strip. Not to mention it can easily be a 11 second car with headers, exhaust, and intake. Last edited by Inspired; 01-27-2011 at 09:21 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 09:07 PM | #21 |
Major
199
Rep 1,192
Posts |
"To sum it up then, the Lexus does many things brilliantly, but the BMW, that does everything brilliantly. In the past you had to be a cock to buy one, now though, you're a cock if you don't."
-JC Haha
__________________
R8 V10 6MT
S65 M3 Tesla 3 |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2011, 09:10 PM | #22 |
Major General
126
Rep 6,594
Posts |
Nothing wrong with the IS-F, it's a great car. But the only reason I would take the M3 is ride quality. The IS-F (especially an 08) would be tough to live with everyday on roads around here. Maybe this doesn't matter as much in CA though.
Drive them both and see what feels best to you.
__________________
X7 LCI // Incoming C7 ZR1 ZTK // Sebring + TRX // Hydro + Raptor Gen1 Roush // Tuxedo |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|