11-20-2010, 02:12 AM | #1 |
Colonel
161
Rep 2,811
Posts |
walk around lens?
any suggestions on a cheap but good quality "walk around" lens...18-200, 250, 270? I need it for a couple of days and probably wouldn't be using it often after that. I'm leaning towards the Sigma 18-200...any thoughts?
__________________
|
11-20-2010, 08:20 PM | #2 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Just my opinion... but "cheap" and "good quality" usually don't go hand-in-hand. My suggestion is getting a 24-70mm for a great all-day walking around lens.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2010, 08:54 PM | #3 |
Colonel
161
Rep 2,811
Posts |
To be specific, I need it for Disney parade to get some close ups of the characters. I don't want to spend too much money on it because I know it's gonna sit in the bag for the most part. It's just nice to have something to grab just in case I need it.
Here are some taken with a crappy 75-300 non IS that I no longer have...sold it because it sucks in low light situations. I think quality is not bad at all.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2010, 11:36 PM | #5 |
Professional Moose Racer
325
Rep 7,509
Posts |
24-105mm f/4 may be a better choice. I found that 70-200mm in an iteration is too "long".
__________________
Visit my blog anytime: http://www.sfpayments.com
BMW Dream Team PNW Chapter, member #1 |HP Autowerks | AR DESIGN | BMW PERFORMANCE | STOP TECH | Volk Racing| AMS | ARKYM |
Appreciate
0
|
11-22-2010, 01:36 PM | #6 |
Major
126
Rep 1,368
Posts |
its a tough choice on a crop - wide or long, because you relay cant get both with quality glass on a crop.
i had a 28-135 which i got a good copy because i would get great sharp shots but i really hated the 28mm because its not wide and i was not going to use my old 18-55 non IS lens. i got a 17-55IS
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2010, 12:07 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant General
680
Rep 10,584
Posts |
Canon copied that one of Nikon i'm sure its a good lens too.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2010, 12:26 AM | #10 |
I like cars
340
Rep 5,051
Posts |
For a 1.6 crop body I would say 17-40 F4L or 24-70 F2.8L, depending on where you are and what you're shooting.
Tamron also makes a 28-75 F2.8 lens that works very well. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2010, 12:19 PM | #11 |
Second Lieutenant
49
Rep 280
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2010, 03:39 PM | #12 |
Colonel
161
Rep 2,811
Posts |
I have a 17-35mm f2.8...that's my daily lens. I need one with a long enough zoom to get a close up of the characters without having to swap every minute.
__________________
Last edited by khaye1; 11-27-2010 at 02:39 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2010, 06:35 PM | #14 |
Colonel
161
Rep 2,811
Posts |
L lenses are out of the budget, unfortunately. I'm not baller status like you all are . Besides, it will spend most of it's time in the bag...untouched. I would rent but seeing that I have to rent the whole week and it's going to cost $100 +, I might as well put some on top of it and make it mine
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2010, 07:13 PM | #16 | |
Bootleggin' 'n Gunrunnin'
146
Rep 2,372
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Scott
2024 G01 X3 M40i, Brooklyn Grey Metallic /// 2015 F15 X5 35i, Space Gray Metallic, 99K miles /// 2013 F30 320xi, Mojave Metallic, 112k miles 2019 Ford F450 STX, Oxford White 2013 Ducati Multistrada Touring S, Red |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 07:32 AM | #17 |
Banned
650
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
I had a 28-135mm and loved the flexibility it offered except yes, 28mm isn't very wide on a crop.
Right now I have a 16-35 2.8L for walk around and then I just jump to 70-200 f4 if I need zoom. If you can't afford the L's then I'd say you're stuck with either the 17-55mm or 28-135mm. I don't recommend anything like an 18-200mm as the more zoom you put into a lens the lower quality image you usually get out of it. That's at least what I was told. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2010, 09:44 PM | #18 |
Colonel
161
Rep 2,811
Posts |
okay guys...so I went on bought an 18-200mm (it's the range that fits my needs). As I mentioned before, I don't have a lot of use for it and decided that I really don't want to spend too much on it. I ended up with a Tamron 18-200mm and let me tell you...this thing is pretty okay for a cheapo lens. I bought it for $290 - $25 for "black friday" special(bought it on Sunday) and $100 mail in rebate. Total for the lens with taxes was $190.
Images taken with this thing...please disregard composition, I'm still learning. Let me know what you guys think. Any constructive criticism is welcome Edit: didn't get to use it during the parade...inconsiderate people crowding up the front...even after yelling "sit yo ass down"
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2010, 11:10 PM | #19 |
Major General
153
Rep 6,603
Posts
Drives: e92 335i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Cal
|
what are some good aftermarket brands? I am noob so I don't know. By the way I have a nikon d3000 since I am new to the dslr world. any help of lenses would be great
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-04-2010, 12:38 AM | #20 |
Colonel
161
Rep 2,811
Posts |
I'm biased over Tamron...got the 17-35mm f2.8 and as mentioned above 18-200. so Tamron, Sigma & Tokina are probably going to round up the top 3.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-04-2010, 12:18 PM | #22 |
Major General
153
Rep 6,603
Posts
Drives: e92 335i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Cal
|
thanks
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|