02-28-2012, 05:06 PM | #45 | ||
trollololol
155
Rep 878
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't see the crash, but I assume he crashed into a metal barrier, which is designed to bend and absorb energy and transfer it throughout the rail.
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 05:07 PM | #46 | |
Enlisted Member
6
Rep 44
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 05:30 PM | #47 |
Captain
74
Rep 643
Posts |
I didn't mean to start a debate about whether this crash was survivable. There will always be some instance that is not survivable no matter how much safety gear is used.
Today's race cars have incredible cage systems, and we see the drivers survive high speed crashes all the time. If more of these safety systems were employed on street cars, they would be even safer than they are now. Today, our everyday cars are SOO much safer than the cars our parents drove, designs that absorb energy, airbags, and now electronic safety devices, traction control, etc. This crash however is extra brutal. One can only speculate on surviving. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 05:33 PM | #48 | ||
Private First Class
10
Rep 167
Posts
Drives: 2003 Z4 3.0i, Black Saphire
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 06:04 PM | #49 | |
Colonel
705
Rep 2,548
Posts
Drives: '08 135i, '88 325is
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver, CO
|
Quote:
Like RevsPlease mentioned, I've seen some crazy wrecks in racing vehicles with cages hitting a stationary object at speed. I wouldn't think some of those wrecks were survivable, but the occupants did survive. You're right though, this case is different with the truck traveling in the opposite direction also at speed.
__________________
Delivered in Munich, broken in on the Nurburgring.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 06:25 PM | #50 | |
but no flokka
541
Rep 719
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 06:28 PM | #51 | |||
Enlisted Member
6
Rep 44
Posts |
Quote:
Heres the equation if you want to figure out the forces of semi vs truck and car vs wall. Not going to do it cause I know the end result, but if you think you can prove me wrong, have fun. (W1+W2+F12+F21) (Delta t) = (m1vf1+m2vf2)-(m1vi1+m2vi2) W=Weight F=Force t=time m=mass vf=velocity final vi=velocity initial |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 06:31 PM | #52 | ||
Enlisted Member
6
Rep 44
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 06:58 PM | #53 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 167
Posts
Drives: 2003 Z4 3.0i, Black Saphire
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
No I get it, I'm just playing the devils advocate. Yes the metal barrier is built to absorb an impact, but so is the SUV and so is the truck, that's what I'm saying.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 07:09 PM | #54 |
Captain
30
Rep 769
Posts |
Well, the front or the rear of the car is meant to absorb an impact... the side has virtually no crumple zone which was what happened here.
RIP =(
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 07:10 PM | #55 |
Careful, I Bite.....
157
Rep 504
Posts |
OK, here's a great example of when two objects collide. This is the system I work on.
The infrared imagery shows the pure kinetic energy given off. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 07:25 PM | #56 | |
Enlisted Member
6
Rep 44
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 07:28 PM | #57 |
Banned
257
Rep 1,106
Posts |
Same thing happened to 4 girls from my college just this past week.
They however were broadsided by a SUV as apposed to a Semi/tractor trailer Their car jumped across the ditch on the interstate and flew broadside into oncoming traffic. The SUV hit their car. You can faintly see the remains of their car and the other car (Toyota) that rear ended the SUV in this picture. These 4 did not make it unfortunately . It leaves no doubt in my mind that the individual driving this SUV was virtually disintegrated on impact |
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 07:41 PM | #59 |
but no flokka
541
Rep 719
Posts |
guys... you really dont need to give equations. Trust me, anyone that thinks that was avoidable is beyond helping at this point. please stop arguing physics.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 08:03 PM | #60 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 167
Posts
Drives: 2003 Z4 3.0i, Black Saphire
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Got it. Thanks for the explanation. I failed to account for weight&momentum.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 08:05 PM | #61 |
Colonel
180
Rep 2,210
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 09:15 PM | #62 |
Captain
256
Rep 840
Posts
Drives: BMW F13 M6 // BMW F22 M235i
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Austin, Texas+ San Antonio
|
I said "OH f*&k" out loud! 18 wheelers can pummel anything in their path.
__________________
BMW FTW!
"Power is nothing without Control" - Pirelli. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 10:06 PM | #63 |
Brigadier General
245
Rep 3,563
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 11:02 PM | #65 | |
Private First Class
10
Rep 167
Posts
Drives: 2003 Z4 3.0i, Black Saphire
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-28-2012, 11:06 PM | #66 | |
Major
248
Rep 1,247
Posts
Drives: E60 M5, E71 X6M, E46 M3
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: At the gas station
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2006 BMW E46 M3 'vert [0.00]
2008 BMW M5 [0.00] 2011 BMW E92 [0.00] 2012 BMW X6M [0.00] 2003 E46 M3 [0.00] |
Quote:
RIP....those accidents were not survivable...
__________________
Current: 2006 E46 M3 'vert 6-sp 2008 E60 M5, 2011 E92 328 6-sp, 2011 E70 N55, 2012 E71 X6M
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|