BMW i5 and 5-Series Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-28-2012, 05:06 PM   #45
eVitO
trollololol
eVitO's Avatar
Ukraine
155
Rep
878
Posts

Drives: Too slow
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles/UCSD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonCSU View Post
Not likely. The point of a full welded roll cage is to protect the occupant space no matter what the vehicle hits. Ever see some of the videos of WRC cars flying off ledges, hitting trees, or rolling for hundreds of yards? The cars are completely trashed, but the cage keeps the occupants from becoming crushed. Even if that SUV had a full roll cage and 5 point harness, the outcome still wouldn't be good.
Dude, the human body can only take about 10G's of acceleration. Let's say they were each going 100kmh each. That's 120mph of instantaneous acceleration in the opposition direction. The energy transfer for sure would have killed him, no matter if the car was more solid or not.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RevsPlease View Post
You guys are probably right about the average cage being ineffective in this kind of situation since there is such a huge transfer of energy, but you gotta wonder what they are capable of. Anyone remember the Allan McNish crash last year at Le Mans? High speed (200mph) impact into a crash barrier going sideways and the man climbs out of the wreckage unharmed and walks away. Granted we aren't talking about the average steel roll cage or LeMans car, but the point still stands.

I didn't see the crash, but I assume he crashed into a metal barrier, which is designed to bend and absorb energy and transfer it throughout the rail.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisGuy View Post
god damn that car is nice. i would sell my girlfriend for it
Quote:
Originally Posted by mastek View Post
why dont you leave him a love note on the car -- with hearts and shit

lol - seriously tho -- I find notes on my car sometimes -- but it's NEVER from girls -- -- damm M3 is a ghey magnet
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 05:07 PM   #46
Blayne
Enlisted Member
6
Rep
44
Posts

Drives: Escalade
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RevsPlease
You guys are probably right about the average cage being ineffective in this kind of situation since there is such a huge transfer of energy, but you gotta wonder what they are capable of. Anyone remember the Allan McNish crash last year at Le Mans? High speed (200mph) impact into a crash barrier going sideways and the man climbs out of the wreckage unharmed and walks away. Granted we aren't talking about the average steel roll cage or LeMans car, but the point still stands.
Wall had no momentum, that now that truck on the other hand p=mv.....can't even imagine. I would go into detail more but to be honest, I hated physics and would probably get the rest wrong as I can't remember it all to well. Though, I can tell you that a roll cage would have done fuck all.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 05:30 PM   #47
mike the snake
Captain
74
Rep
643
Posts

Drives: 135i
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sonoma County, CA.

iTrader: (1)

I didn't mean to start a debate about whether this crash was survivable. There will always be some instance that is not survivable no matter how much safety gear is used.

Today's race cars have incredible cage systems, and we see the drivers survive high speed crashes all the time. If more of these safety systems were employed on street cars, they would be even safer than they are now.

Today, our everyday cars are SOO much safer than the cars our parents drove, designs that absorb energy, airbags, and now electronic safety devices, traction control, etc.

This crash however is extra brutal. One can only speculate on surviving.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 05:33 PM   #48
RevsPlease
Private First Class
10
Rep
167
Posts

Drives: 2003 Z4 3.0i, Black Saphire
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blayne
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevsPlease
You guys are probably right about the average cage being ineffective in this kind of situation since there is such a huge transfer of energy, but you gotta wonder what they are capable of. Anyone remember the Allan McNish crash last year at Le Mans? High speed (200mph) impact into a crash barrier going sideways and the man climbs out of the wreckage unharmed and walks away. Granted we aren't talking about the average steel roll cage or LeMans car, but the point still stands.
Wall had no momentum, that now that truck on the other hand p=mv.....can't even imagine. I would go into detail more but to be honest, I hated physics and would probably get the rest wrong as I can't remember it all to well. Though, I can tell you that a roll cage would have done fuck all.
I agree with you about it being useless, but for the sake of argument the speed differential and impact absorption in both situations are likely very similar. 200mph LM car into stationary metal barrier = 200mph impact. Let's assume that both vehicles in the video were traveling ~60mph each, that makes their impact speed 120mph. Like I said you can't really compare an LM car to a standard vehicle but I don't think it would be beyond reason to claim that a cage/harness would have enhanced the drivers survivability be it ever so slightly.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 06:04 PM   #49
JasonCSU
Colonel
United_States
705
Rep
2,548
Posts

Drives: '08 135i, '88 325is
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver, CO

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
1988 BMW 325is  [0.00]
2008 BMW 135i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by eVitO View Post
Dude, the human body can only take about 10G's of acceleration. Let's say they were each going 100kmh each. That's 120mph of instantaneous acceleration in the opposition direction. The energy transfer for sure would have killed him, no matter if the car was more solid or not.
I guess I should have elaborated a bit more. The point I was wanting to make was that the SUV wouldn't have exploded as such if it had a full roll cage in it. With the rapid acceleration change and transfer of energy, I agree the driver would still be seriously injured, possibly fatally.

Like RevsPlease mentioned, I've seen some crazy wrecks in racing vehicles with cages hitting a stationary object at speed. I wouldn't think some of those wrecks were survivable, but the occupants did survive. You're right though, this case is different with the truck traveling in the opposite direction also at speed.
__________________
Delivered in Munich, broken in on the Nurburgring.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 06:25 PM   #50
Wakka
but no flokka
Wakka's Avatar
United_States
541
Rep
719
Posts

Drives: M2C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tampa

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RevsPlease View Post
I agree with you about it being useless, but for the sake of argument the speed differential and impact absorption in both situations are likely very similar. 200mph LM car into stationary metal barrier = 200mph impact. Let's assume that both vehicles in the video were traveling ~60mph each, that makes their impact speed 120mph. Like I said you can't really compare an LM car to a standard vehicle but I don't think it would be beyond reason to claim that a cage/harness would have enhanced the drivers survivability be it ever so slightly.
you are not understanding how those metal barriers are made. they are designed to absorb the impact. a fucking semi truck does not absorb shit.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTM View Post
Entourage sucks. BTM hates everything
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 06:28 PM   #51
Blayne
Enlisted Member
6
Rep
44
Posts

Drives: Escalade
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RevsPlease
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blayne
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevsPlease
You guys are probably right about the average cage being ineffective in this kind of situation since there is such a huge transfer of energy, but you gotta wonder what they are capable of. Anyone remember the Allan McNish crash last year at Le Mans? High speed (200mph) impact into a crash barrier going sideways and the man climbs out of the wreckage unharmed and walks away. Granted we aren't talking about the average steel roll cage or LeMans car, but the point still stands.
Wall had no momentum, that now that truck on the other hand p=mv.....can't even imagine. I would go into detail more but to be honest, I hated physics and would probably get the rest wrong as I can't remember it all to well. Though, I can tell you that a roll cage would have done fuck all.
I agree with you about it being useless, but for the sake of argument the speed differential and impact absorption in both situations are likely very similar. 200mph LM car into stationary metal barrier = 200mph impact. Let's assume that both vehicles in the video were traveling ~60mph each, that makes their impact speed 120mph. Like I said you can't really compare an LM car to a standard vehicle but I don't think it would be beyond reason to claim that a cage/harness would have enhanced the drivers survivability be it ever so slightly.
I guess the roll cage could have helped like .0000001 but it's not making this guys chance of living any better. I'd take my chances crashing into a wall at 250mph, rather then getting hit by that semi the way he did.

Heres the equation if you want to figure out the forces of semi vs truck and car vs wall. Not going to do it cause I know the end result, but if you think you can prove me wrong, have fun.

(W1+W2+F12+F21) (Delta t) = (m1vf1+m2vf2)-(m1vi1+m2vi2)

W=Weight
F=Force
t=time
m=mass
vf=velocity final
vi=velocity initial
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 06:31 PM   #52
Blayne
Enlisted Member
6
Rep
44
Posts

Drives: Escalade
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wakka
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevsPlease View Post
I agree with you about it being useless, but for the sake of argument the speed differential and impact absorption in both situations are likely very similar. 200mph LM car into stationary metal barrier = 200mph impact. Let's assume that both vehicles in the video were traveling ~60mph each, that makes their impact speed 120mph. Like I said you can't really compare an LM car to a standard vehicle but I don't think it would be beyond reason to claim that a cage/harness would have enhanced the drivers survivability be it ever so slightly.
you are not understanding how those metal barriers are made. they are designed to absorb the impact. a fucking semi truck does not absorb shit.
He doesn't understand that speed is only part of it, and even if he's not taking into account that the walls absorb the F. A solid wall still beats the fucking semi, which is most likely caring a large load, which is devastating to anything in its path.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 06:58 PM   #53
RevsPlease
Private First Class
10
Rep
167
Posts

Drives: 2003 Z4 3.0i, Black Saphire
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [10.00]
No I get it, I'm just playing the devils advocate. Yes the metal barrier is built to absorb an impact, but so is the SUV and so is the truck, that's what I'm saying.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 07:09 PM   #54
scorcherjf
Captain
scorcherjf's Avatar
30
Rep
769
Posts

Drives: 2008 135i
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NJ

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2008 135i  [0.00]
Well, the front or the rear of the car is meant to absorb an impact... the side has virtually no crumple zone which was what happened here.

RIP =(
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevsPlease View Post
No I get it, I'm just playing the devils advocate. Yes the metal barrier is built to absorb an impact, but so is the SUV and so is the truck, that's what I'm saying.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 07:10 PM   #55
MadDog
Careful, I Bite.....
MadDog's Avatar
United_States
157
Rep
504
Posts

Drives: 2006 325i
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2006 325i  [7.50]
OK, here's a great example of when two objects collide. This is the system I work on.

The infrared imagery shows the pure kinetic energy given off.




Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 07:25 PM   #56
Blayne
Enlisted Member
6
Rep
44
Posts

Drives: Escalade
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RevsPlease
No I get it, I'm just playing the devils advocate. Yes the metal barrier is built to absorb an impact, but so is the SUV and so is the truck, that's what I'm saying.
Do the equation above. You can leave out W, and use a standard of 1 for time. Use 60 for the speed of the SUV and truck and 200 for the car. SUV weighs about say 5000 and the race car 4000 (could be to heavy but who cares) now the semi, 80,000 comes up a lot but to be fair let's say it weighs 60,000. Now the momentum of the semi alone is 3,600,000 now compare that to the car of having 800,000.....get it yet it? The car is now going into something with NO momentum. Now the truck has a momentum itself of 300,000 crashing into the truck. You can complete the question if you don't see what am getting that. The roll cage helps in the car, but times that crash by like 4-7 (just guess cause I'm not completing it) and you have what the driver of the SUV experienced.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 07:28 PM   #57
BMWinNorthdakota
Banned
257
Rep
1,106
Posts

Drives: 2007 bmw 335i e90
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Fargo ND

iTrader: (0)

Same thing happened to 4 girls from my college just this past week.

They however were broadsided by a SUV as apposed to a Semi/tractor trailer

Their car jumped across the ditch on the interstate and flew broadside into oncoming traffic. The SUV hit their car. You can faintly see the remains of their car and the other car (Toyota) that rear ended the SUV in this picture.



These 4 did not make it unfortunately . It leaves no doubt in my mind that the individual driving this SUV was virtually disintegrated on impact

Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 07:33 PM   #58
Blayne
Enlisted Member
6
Rep
44
Posts

Drives: Escalade
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

And for the above, yes I know I didn't use SI units, just wanted to give a picture of what it was like.

N may the girls above this post RIP as well.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 07:41 PM   #59
Wakka
but no flokka
Wakka's Avatar
United_States
541
Rep
719
Posts

Drives: M2C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tampa

iTrader: (2)

guys... you really dont need to give equations. Trust me, anyone that thinks that was avoidable is beyond helping at this point. please stop arguing physics.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTM View Post
Entourage sucks. BTM hates everything
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 08:03 PM   #60
RevsPlease
Private First Class
10
Rep
167
Posts

Drives: 2003 Z4 3.0i, Black Saphire
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [10.00]
Got it. Thanks for the explanation. I failed to account for weight&momentum.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 08:05 PM   #61
stimpy
Colonel
180
Rep
2,210
Posts

Drives: E92 335i
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix AZ

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakeme521 View Post
A roll cage wouldn't have done shit but contain his remains a little bit better. Fully loaded semi vs. an SUV, semi will win no matter what the suv is made of. Straight physics.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 09:15 PM   #62
Nutballa
Captain
Nutballa's Avatar
United_States
256
Rep
840
Posts

Drives: BMW F13 M6 // BMW F22 M235i
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Austin, Texas+ San Antonio

iTrader: (1)

I said "OH f*&k" out loud! 18 wheelers can pummel anything in their path.
__________________
BMW FTW!

"Power is nothing without Control" - Pirelli.


Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 10:06 PM   #63
yakev724
Brigadier General
yakev724's Avatar
245
Rep
3,563
Posts

Drives: 15 S3
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NYC

iTrader: (49)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDog View Post
OK, here's a great example of when two objects collide. This is the system I work on.

The infrared imagery shows the pure kinetic energy given off.
Cool stuff, thx for sharing
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 10:32 PM   #64
sanf
Second Lieutenant
21
Rep
261
Posts

Drives: F10 535XI
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: East Coast

iTrader: (1)

Aside from roll cages..I am thinking a good set of snow tires would probably have saved him. RIP
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 11:02 PM   #65
RevsPlease
Private First Class
10
Rep
167
Posts

Drives: 2003 Z4 3.0i, Black Saphire
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanf
Aside from roll cages..I am thinking a good set of snow tires would probably have saved him. RIP
Yea probably the best suggestion so far lol. That and a day on a skip pad could save your life.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 11:06 PM   #66
ideliver
Major
ideliver's Avatar
248
Rep
1,247
Posts

Drives: E60 M5, E71 X6M, E46 M3
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: At the gas station

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2006 BMW E46 M3 'vert  [0.00]
2008 BMW M5  [0.00]
2011 BMW E92  [0.00]
2012 BMW X6M  [0.00]
2003 E46 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanf View Post
Aside from roll cages..I am thinking a good set of snow tires would probably have saved him. RIP
my wife thinks i'm nuts becuase I buy winter tires for every vehicle...our Infiniti QX 56 included...AWD + Blizzaks = snow machine

RIP....those accidents were not survivable...
__________________
Current: 2006 E46 M3 'vert 6-sp 2008 E60 M5, 2011 E92 328 6-sp, 2011 E70 N55, 2012 E71 X6M

Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.




g60
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST