09-14-2007, 12:03 PM | #23 | |
Lieutenant
27
Rep 580
Posts |
Quote:
I cannot understand the M5 being included in the top 3 over the E92. By what criteria is the M5 better? (Perhaps an Evo editor owns an E39?) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2007, 12:41 PM | #24 |
O! So Sour!!
556
Rep 15,612
Posts
Drives: Fast 240z / Slow M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 'Merica!
|
damn thats sick to see the busted out the M1.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2007, 01:04 PM | #25 | |
Lieutenant
35
Rep 563
Posts
Drives: 2007 E92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
|
Quote:
It is becoming more and more clear to me that the E92 M3 is perhaps the true successor to the old 6-series. It seems to have much more of an all round GT character (refinement, power, size, versatility) than its ancestors, but objectively still offers fantastic performance Since this is going to be my main car (i.e. +2hrs/day av. speed 15 mph) I'm really not too unhappy about this either... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2007, 01:23 PM | #26 |
My favorite sign.
175
Rep 4,338
Posts |
Good info, but I love my M car over all others...if nothing else it brings the sexy back
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2007, 04:23 PM | #27 | |
Brigadier General
137
Rep 3,132
Posts |
Quote:
The E39 M5 FTW. If I had the cash lying around and trusted old cars more, I would buy one right now just to be a housepet.
__________________
2018 R35 GT-R Cicio800 | 2007 E92 335i - RB Turbos, TC Kline DA Coils, HPA M3 Suspension, Quaife LSD, Stoptech BBK, JB4, FuelIT, AR Downpipes, RDSport Quads, Stett OC, Helix IC, Volk TE-37, Vorsteiner V-35, OSS Headlights | Retired - 2015 F82 M4
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|