03-28-2011, 09:46 PM | #1 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Lens autofocus accuracy comparisons
I, for one, don't want to start a Canon vs. Nikon debate. However, since there has been a lot of talk about which lens to buy, etc, I thought this article would be relevant. Also, it was a good read and I wanted to share it with all of you.
http://lionel-photo.webatu.com/pmwik...ain/AFAccuracy
__________________
|
03-28-2011, 10:29 PM | #2 |
Major General
708
Rep 5,382
Posts |
too much reading, is there a video?
jk
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2011, 11:23 PM | #3 |
Bootleggin' 'n Gunrunnin'
146
Rep 2,372
Posts |
Nikon is teh awesomez, Canon is the suX0r!
__________________
Scott
2024 G01 X3 M40i, Brooklyn Grey Metallic /// 2015 F15 X5 35i, Space Gray Metallic, 99K miles /// 2013 F30 320xi, Mojave Metallic, 112k miles 2019 Ford F450 STX, Oxford White 2013 Ducati Multistrada Touring S, Red |
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2011, 10:44 PM | #4 |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
interesting read.... basically says, stick with the same brand on camera body and camera lens, don't get 3rd party stuff or you'll get higher chance of out of focus shots.
also to stick with F 2.8 lenses and slower as the bodies aren't calibrated for a faster lens. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2011, 11:54 PM | #5 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Well, getting something faster than f/2.8 would give you a better low-light lens as well as more bokeh. You just gotta pair it with the right body.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2011, 12:02 AM | #8 |
Free Thinker
19340
Rep 7,552
Posts |
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2011, 12:07 AM | #9 | |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
Quote:
they would be more work then worth for me to pick up. Canadian border and all. I'll have to check the canadian cl listings. I think my next major consideration will be the 70-300mm DO lense canon makes, but I don't know if i can justify the money for something that has to be stopped down a lot before giving a good quality image. I'll probably rent one soon to see if i like it enough to buy. Hard not to like the size of the lens. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2011, 12:10 AM | #10 | |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2011, 12:12 AM | #11 |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
probably will be within the next few weeks, once i'm home. I'll keep you up to date.
I don't know anyone who has tryed it, so it's sorta down to the last resort for renting it and seeing first hand. (which obviously "try before buy") after hearing about the length limit some stadiums are imposing on camera lenses, it seems like a good alternative. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2011, 05:58 PM | #13 |
Banned
650
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2011, 08:20 PM | #14 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2011, 08:52 PM | #15 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1247
Rep 1,598
Posts |
Seriously, Ashu....this is the photography/video sub-forum. Now, get crackin'.
Mark, stop it. I already bought too much camera gear recently and am still itching to complete my collection with some primes.
__________________
- Jeff
bosstones' flickr |
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2011, 08:54 PM | #16 |
Banned
650
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2011, 09:15 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1247
Rep 1,598
Posts |
__________________
- Jeff
bosstones' flickr |
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2011, 09:31 PM | #18 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
It's like there's a bunch of whiny 8 year olds in here...
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2011, 09:33 PM | #19 |
Banned
650
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
Why Are You Calling Me Names?!?!?!?!
all caps fail |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|