View Poll Results: which would you prefer | |||
Tahoe | 2 | 4.76% | |
Yukon | 3 | 7.14% | |
Volvo XC90 | 8 | 19.05% | |
Merc GL | 11 | 26.19% | |
Escalade | 11 | 26.19% | |
Audi Q7 | 7 | 16.67% | |
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
10-31-2015, 09:01 AM | #25 |
Private First Class
38
Rep 104
Posts |
XC90 with R-design! I have owned several Volvo's, I've always liked them but never been a fan of the looks. Fit and finish is just as the premium brands and Volvo comes with really comfy seats as standard. Probably not as fun as the Q7 and GL but I actually would pick the Volvo over these two since it's cheaper and better looking. Volvo is heavily underrated and they're currently stepping up their game big time.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2015, 07:09 PM | #27 |
Colonel
202
Rep 2,348
Posts |
The GM vehicles are going to give you lots more space than the other options. Half of the options on the list are 7 seaters, but the GM cars have space for 7 and some luggage. This is huge if you're wanting to tow more than 5 and have room for luggage inside the car. Also, the GM vehicles are going to have a lower maintenance cost and likely be more reliable than most of the vehicles listed. |
Appreciate
1
|
10-31-2015, 11:45 PM | #28 |
S58 Love
605
Rep 485
Posts
Drives: 2023 M4 Competition xDrive
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: OR
|
Toyota Sequoia
__________________
MAC
Current: 2023 G82|BG over BLK Prior: 2008 N54 E82|AW over CR Also: FJ60, Volvo Recharge |
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2015, 08:10 AM | #29 |
Colonel
407
Rep 2,348
Posts |
i suppose less maintenance the better meaning the better the warranty period the better.
I assume Euro vehicles have higher mileage and longer warranty?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2015, 10:18 AM | #30 |
Major General
2458
Rep 7,341
Posts |
All three of these cars share the same chassis and drivetrains and have very low maintenance costs.
__________________
The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Bimmerpost.
2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee High Altitude Hemi | 2010 S4 Sold | 2010 BMW 135i Retired | 2006 Lotus Exige Sold |
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2015, 06:44 PM | #31 |
Captain
345
Rep 946
Posts |
Low Maintanance compared to what? To an M3? Of course. I had a 2003 Suburban. I bought it with around 35k and drive it to 98k. It almost ruined me!!!! That's why I don't like those cars. I guess they are better right now but one of the main problems was the engine was too heavy for the suspension and the thing didn't brake not to mention it was the best.....guzzler.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2015, 09:37 AM | #32 | |
Major General
2458
Rep 7,341
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Bimmerpost.
2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee High Altitude Hemi | 2010 S4 Sold | 2010 BMW 135i Retired | 2006 Lotus Exige Sold |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2015, 05:26 PM | #34 |
Colonel
192
Rep 2,431
Posts |
Used/new land cruiser gets my vote.
I owned 06 land cruiser 07G500 11 Gl450 14 mdx 14 x5 And now my 15 2500 ram cummins g56 is my family fortress/cruiser. The land cruiser is pretty tight inside for the size but the reliability and suv history trumps the luxury euro SUVs and their issues
__________________
F80 m3, 997 gt3, 14 ram ctd, f15 x5, drz400sm Gone:z4m, boss 302, c6 z06, m6,z3m |
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2015, 05:27 PM | #35 | |
Colonel
192
Rep 2,431
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
F80 m3, 997 gt3, 14 ram ctd, f15 x5, drz400sm Gone:z4m, boss 302, c6 z06, m6,z3m |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|