[Fundguy1]

Originally Posted by Ali Shiralian

There was a reason mercedes got rid of Chrysler. Too many quality issues and the workmanship is just not on par for what they are asking price wise. Not even mentioning the depreciation and resale value here.

Still doesn't change the fact that the GC still benefitted from that. I'm not much of a Chrysler or jeep fan. But like all car companies there's one or two that are OK. Chevy has corvette. Ford Mustang and F150. Etc.

[Ali Shiralian]

Originally Posted by Fundguy1

Still doesn't change the fact that the GC still benefitted from that. I'm not much of a Chrysler or jeep fan. But like all car companies there's one or two that are OK. Chevy has corvette. Ford Mustang and F150. Etc.

I agree, most companies have one or two good models, I just can justify paying 70K for GC when there are other better options out there.

[Fundguy1]

Originally Posted by Ali Shiralian

I agree, most companies have one or two good models, I just can justify paying 70K for GC when there are other better options out there.

True. I'd have something else for 70k. Doesn't mean a normal GC is bad or the SRT isn't great Just others are greater. But it drives me nuts when they slam all GC when for a normal one at the normal price it's tough to beat.