07-27-2011, 03:53 PM | #67 | ||
Lieutenant
93
Rep 489
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
That's why you get these bro's cutting to 1500 cals at 6' and don't understand why they stall. You post over at ******* Bob? I live in the Nutrition section, although it's changed quite a bit in the past 8 months.
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
07-28-2011, 04:44 AM | #68 | |
Lieutenant
744
Rep 586
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08...ex.html?hpt=T2 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-28-2011, 08:23 AM | #69 | |
623lb puller
27
Rep 199
Posts |
Quote:
edit: if the info in the article is right he went from 67lbs of fat to 43lbs of fat and 134 lean lb mass to 131 lean lb mass. lol |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-28-2011, 08:27 AM | #70 | |
623lb puller
27
Rep 199
Posts |
Quote:
you say no, then what you state seems to agree (like the length and quality of the cut) there are a lot of variables when losing weigh which impacts how much muscle versus fat will be lost. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-28-2011, 10:12 AM | #71 | ||
Lieutenant
93
Rep 489
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
07-28-2011, 04:26 PM | #73 | |
Lieutenant
744
Rep 586
Posts |
Quote:
brb skinnyfat |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|