05-27-2011, 01:59 PM | #1 |
Major
221
Rep 1,395
Posts |
AF 447 Crash Details Emerge...
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/americ...ex.html?hpt=T2
For those of you that fly, you know how important it is to know true airspeed at all material times. It didn't help that the pilot was not in the cockpit and they had kids for co-pilots... Very sad and my heart goes out to the victims families.
__________________
Club 6MT 2008 E92 M3 6MT, AW/Blk Ext., brushed aluminum 2006 E46 M3 ZCP 6MT Carbon blk/blk(sold) 2001 E46 325Xi 5MT Jet Blk/Blk (sold) |
05-27-2011, 02:07 PM | #2 | |
Captain
188
Rep 962
Posts |
Quote:
Is it me or does the article not read well? They say "At the time of the descent, the two co-pilots and captain were in the aircraft cockpit." but then they say "The report said that at this time co-pilot PNF tried several times to call the captain back to the cockpit." I know it seemed to be broken up into separate events, but seems confusing to me. RIP to all of them though |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 02:10 PM | #3 | |
Major
221
Rep 1,395
Posts |
Quote:
The horror on the plane as it dropped 38000 feet in just over 3 minutes is unimaginable.
__________________
Club 6MT 2008 E92 M3 6MT, AW/Blk Ext., brushed aluminum 2006 E46 M3 ZCP 6MT Carbon blk/blk(sold) 2001 E46 325Xi 5MT Jet Blk/Blk (sold) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 02:30 PM | #4 |
Major
118
Rep 1,347
Posts
Drives: 2011 335d
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Ya they screwed up big time. The glide rate on the A330 is fairly decent if they hadn't completely throw the thing of tilt.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 02:32 PM | #5 |
Banned
797
Rep 4,643
Posts |
What I don't get is why the pilots couldn't identify a pitot malfunction pretty quickly. There are redundancies in place that could have prevented this accident. Flying in a storm at altitude is a known icing condition. I wonder why they didn't even bother to check their speed on either GPS or INS. I dunno...a lot of this sounds similar to the Avianca accident.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 02:34 PM | #6 | |
Major
221
Rep 1,395
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Club 6MT 2008 E92 M3 6MT, AW/Blk Ext., brushed aluminum 2006 E46 M3 ZCP 6MT Carbon blk/blk(sold) 2001 E46 325Xi 5MT Jet Blk/Blk (sold) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 03:16 PM | #7 |
Banned
797
Rep 4,643
Posts |
I dunno about all that. The pilots were obviously experienced enough to be flying TATL flights on a widebody jet. I don't think it helped that the most experienced pilot was asleep and came in mid-way through all the critical events. That just causes more delay in the troubleshooting by having to catch him up on everything. I think panic played a palpable part of all this as well. Seems as they just started cranking on all the controls.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 04:01 PM | #8 | |
Major
288
Rep 1,088
Posts |
Quote:
As far as redundancy, there're redundant air speed sensors (3 i think), but they suspect that they all iced up and failed. Once you lose track of air speed at 38k feet, you are in pretty deep shit. Flying too slow = stall. Flying too fast, the plane will actually rip apart. And the margin between flying too fast and too slow at 38k feet is relatively small. The higher you fly, this margin becomes smaller. Last edited by jpsum; 05-27-2011 at 04:08 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 04:47 PM | #9 | |
Banned
797
Rep 4,643
Posts |
Quote:
first, at the stall horn, they pulled up, not pushed down. why? overspeed indications are a lot different than stall indications. mind you, the stall warning systems are separate from the pitot/static system. stall warnings occur when at or near the critical angle of attack (separation of airflow over the wings), not based on airspeed, although level flight at low airspeed will produce a stall obviously. there's another redundancy. from studying air accidents in the past, aeroperu 603 (i said avianca earlier, but meant aeroperu 603) had the static ports taped over. of course everything went haywire, but one of the biggest oversights was that the stall warning is a separate system than overspeed or any other pitot/static instruments. they feared an overspeed and basically stalled it all the way to impact. second, pitot ice is a lot easier to deal with than static port blockage. just doing a simple descend/ascend parabola would have shown if the altimeter/VSI was functioning properly thus ruling out static port blockage. airspeed seemed to be the only indication not working properly. that's automatically pitots 100% of the time. if they were worried about airspeed, they should always initiate a slow descend first at a power setting that would be considered normal. of course the ASI is going to function more like a VSI when it's blocked, but that's standard knowledge. i know i would personally much rather be headed downhill at FL380 with ASI problems than try to crank it up. not only that, but just glancing at speed from either the INS (as would be required equip. TATL) or GPS groundspeed would have given them the answer they were looking for. i know the pilots knew the approx. wind speed and direction at that altitude. it's hard not to know for any experienced pilot. simple E6B conversion would give you exact information quickly. third, provided they would have diagnosed to problem, they could have just as easily steered out of trouble, descended, cleared the pitot tubes with pitot heaters and warmer flight levels, and found somewhere to land. i just think this was a case of taking the wrong evasive action too quickly because of the conditions they were flying in. there are too many redundancies on an airplane as complex as an A330 for an accident like this to happen. i think they got locked on to the ASI's and never ran thru all the appropriate emergency checklists and backups. they had to be alert. i know they probably weren't having casual conversations in a lvl 4 TS. i just think panic set in and everything else was out the window. Last edited by Blake; 05-27-2011 at 05:01 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 04:56 PM | #10 |
derp
51
Rep 1,203
Posts |
It's stuff like this that makes me nervous every time my father flies. He's very experienced and one of the best I've ever been flown by, but still. He basically told me that no pilot would pull up in a stall. Some pilots are better than others, but no airline would send an incompetent pilot across the Atlantic. Now it's going to be interesting to see exactly who or what is to blame for the equipment failure... and how bad Airbus's reputation is going suffer.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 05:10 PM | #11 | |
Banned
797
Rep 4,643
Posts |
Quote:
i don't think this will go down as a blemish on airbus as much as it will be pilot error, unless they determine that the pitot heaters failed during flight. it would seem very odd to me if all the pitot heaters failed, as there were at least 2, probably 3 pitots on that plane. i can't fathom that the heaters would all be on the same electrical circuit either, for redundancy purposes. they were either not turned on (pilot error) or something electrical caused the heaters to fail. pilot error seems to be what caused the airplane to stall and likely be sent into an unrecoverable spin. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 08:34 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant
335
Rep 483
Posts |
My guess is they were flying on autopilot and the pitot malfunction put them in unstable flight situation that was made worse by any correction actions.
Wouldn't GPS give a true speed indication as well?
__________________
The journey is the reward.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 09:10 PM | #13 | |
Banned
797
Rep 4,643
Posts |
Quote:
with the pitots being iced over, flying through storms, the atmospheric pressure will change. the blockage will cause the the AIS to read higher during ascent and lower in descent. this is what likely caused the pilots to pull up so severely. they kept seeing the airspeed increase while trying to slow the plane down, thus causing the plane to bleed off almost all the airspeed, sending the plane into an unrecoverable spin. the plane did literally fall out of the sky. if i were to skydive from FL380, it would take me about that long at terminal velocity to hit the ground. i think that it's also worth mentioning that the envelope between breakup and stall in an a330 at that altitude is really small. this probably added to the panic. unfortunately, they didn't recognize the problem in time and the plane drops like a rock. and good luck recovering that plane from a spin once you've put it in one. it won't happen. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 09:49 PM | #14 | |
Lieutenant
335
Rep 483
Posts |
Quote:
I am wondering if they lost all instruments or at least the artificial horizon and were flying blind which would make more sense but I guess that would show up in black box data. This shows flight data in a graphic http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...-attitude.html
__________________
The journey is the reward.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 10:02 PM | #15 | |
New Member
70
Rep 24
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
To the world you may be one person,but to one person you may be the world.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 10:19 PM | #16 |
Major General
385
Rep 8,688
Posts
Drives: 06 330i
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Promise Land
|
lots of facts in this thread.
kind of reminds me of the aeroperu crash, but that was human error. what moron leaves the caps on the pitots??? the pilots flying that 757 were very experienced, from what i have read, and in the moment, its tough to think to check gps for speed (even though it should be first hand) pilot error is a common yet unfortunate event. why didn't the pilots in the american crash in columbia retract the speed brakes? if they did, that plane never would have hit the mountain. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 11:17 PM | #17 | |
Banned
797
Rep 4,643
Posts |
Quote:
i know it can be hard to diagnose the problem as it's happening, but there are so many accident case studies out there that should be at least considered in an emergency situation. that's why we studied them in our AV safety classes. it's a sad tragedy, but yet another lesson we pilots have to learn from. i can't say what i would do given the circumstances, but i do know i wouldn't cut the power and pull up. that goes completely against everything i've ever been taught. i do know a diligent constant scan of all flight instruments, including GPS, could have led to much better situational awareness and probably discovering the discrepancy a lot sooner. like i said, i'm guessing they fixated on the ASI's and took the wrong actions out of haste, sealing their fate. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 11:41 PM | #18 |
Major General
385
Rep 8,688
Posts
Drives: 06 330i
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Promise Land
|
great point. forgot that it was the static ports.. you are right!
i hate to change the subject, but a friend of mine was the co pilot of the legacy jet that clipped the gol 737 in brazil. we have had some long conversations about it, and as horrible of a tragedy as it was, i feel sympathetic for him and the pilot. its a terrible situation. they were just sentenced to community service in the USA, but he told me its not over since the government will appeal it.. every airplane accident is a tragedy, but unfortunately, thats how we learn to try and avoid the next one. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 11:53 PM | #19 |
Lieutenant
335
Rep 483
Posts |
They may have thought they were over-speeding and pulling up nose trying bleed off airspeed because thought they were in a high speed stall?
This article discusses the "coffin corner" which I have never heard of before. The "Coffin Corner" and a "Mesoscale" maw First, a bit of aerodynamics: The doomed Airbus A-330-200 was flying ever so close to its maximum altitude, in a zone pilots call the "Coffin Corner." It refers to the edge of the so-called "flight envelope" of an aircraft. http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/...090608?sp=true
__________________
The journey is the reward.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2011, 11:54 PM | #20 | |
Banned
797
Rep 4,643
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2011, 09:13 AM | #21 |
Sasha Fierce
53
Rep 231
Posts |
what perplexes me is that on board the aircraft there are two attitude systems in the primary instruments that depend on the pito tubes and also an independent system called ISIS that display the same data amongst the other 2. In other words a system failure should be highly impossible. I wonder what was the a330's angle of attack when it was going through this?
__________________
Vivre, Aimer et Voler
Last edited by vioaltec; 05-28-2011 at 09:21 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2011, 11:35 AM | #22 |
Bootleggin' 'n Gunrunnin'
148
Rep 2,372
Posts |
I think pilot inexperience played a part as well:
Information according to Air France press communiqué: Pilot in Command: 11.000 hours total flight experience, 1.700 hours on A330/A340 aircraft 1st Copilot: 3.000 hours total flight experience, 800 hours on A330/A340 aircraft 2nd Copilot: 6.600 hours total flight experience, 2.600 hours on A330/A340 aircraft 1st copilot is in the left seat at time of incident. 3,000 ttl hours is not a lot for an ATP, and 800 hours in type isn't that high either.
__________________
Scott
2024 G01 X3 M40i, Brooklyn Grey Metallic /// 2015 F15 X5 35i, Space Gray Metallic, 99K miles /// 2013 F30 320xi, Mojave Metallic, 112k miles 2019 Ford F450 STX, Oxford White 2013 Ducati Multistrada Touring S, Red |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|