[Dang3r]

Originally Posted by anglo

True

Dude...Airbus is A class and Boeing is known B class, no doubt. The guy is surely looking that the gal is spelling his help correct

[The Choosey begger]

Originally Posted by Dang3r

Dude...Airbus is A class and Boeing is known B class, no doubt. The guy is surely looking that the gal is spelling his help correct

Boeing introduced the first jumbo jet in 1969, Airbus in 2005.
Boeing introduced the first composite airliner in 2009, Airbus in 2013.

Those are Aviation pioneers , i don't see Mr Airbus in this picture.

[ASBSECU E93]

You too close BITCH!!

[ASBSECU E93]

Me: You should save one for later....

Also Me: It IS later....

[BayMoWe335]

Originally Posted by Dang3r

Dude...Airbus is A class and Boeing is known B class, no doubt. The guy is surely looking that the gal is spelling his help correct

You might literally be the only person who believes that. How's that A380 doing? I think they are producing a whole 0.75 A380s/month. What a shock...no one wants to go to hubs for connections.

[The Choosey begger]

Originally Posted by BayMoWe335

You might literally be the only person who believes that. How's that A380 doing? I think they are producing a whole 0.75 A380s/month. What a shock...no one wants to go to hubs for connections.

+1
Boeing just won a lawsuit against Airbus over illegal EU massive subsidies.
With huge subsidies from the EU, Airbus objective was to take Boeing out of business, selling planes at a loss. They failed.

Instead of the EU concentrating on Greece, Portugal etc. their deficit, Their citizens pay higher taxes, they waste it on Airbus, amongst other things.

[Dang3r]

Originally Posted by BayMoWe335

You might literally be the only person who believes that. How's that A380 doing? I think they are producing a whole 0.75 A380s/month. What a shock...no one wants to go to hubs for connections.

So far so good. And Boeing builds a 787 with dangerous batteries and every modelbuilder had tell them before whats the risks of those mounted ones are. What was the result: A longer forced downtime and the laughter from more experienced engineers

Lets not start to pull more one-armed-bandits than necessary. I'd started with Airbus in the very early 80s on an A300 and had former done some F/E trainings on a 707 and also on the 727. At that time Airbus has had the more future related aircrafts and Boeing had wasted a lot of time with old fashioned things until the 777 came out. Sometimes you make your decision and Im an Airbus man since then. Thats means not Im a Boeing hater, but sometimes they got us scratching our heads and ask "how could they"?

Whats would come very interesting is the thing, how your new prez would handle the "homemade things", I mean if he forces your airlines to stop all Airbus orders and lay strictly onto Boeing?

[DDD31]

You want to talk about who built the best commercial airplanes, without a doubt Donald Douglas was the best (and I'm not including anything after they merged with McDonnell which includes the DC-10). Their planes were ridiculously overbuilt and a large amount of them are still flying to this day (see DC-3). If Northwest Airlines was still around, I wouldn't have been surprised if they were still flying the DC-9. The big joke at Northwest was that when they retired their last Airbus, they would fly back from the desert on a DC-9.

[tc328]

Take your plane comments to another thread pls

[gtron]

Originally Posted by tc328

Take your plane comments to another thread pls

LOL

[DDD31]

Originally Posted by tc328

Take your plane comments to another thread pls

Awwww snap, back to my safe space and Play-Doh.

[BayMoWe335]

Originally Posted by Dang3r

So far so good. And Boeing builds a 787 with dangerous batteries and every modelbuilder had tell them before whats the risks of those mounted ones are. What was the result: A longer forced downtime and the laughter from more experienced engineers

Lets not start to pull more one-armed-bandits than necessary. I'd started with Airbus in the very early 80s on an A300 and had former done some F/E trainings on a 707 and also on the 727. At that time Airbus has had the more future related aircrafts and Boeing had wasted a lot of time with old fashioned things until the 777 came out. Sometimes you make your decision and Im an Airbus man since then. Thats means not Im a Boeing hater, but sometimes they got us scratching our heads and ask "how could they"?

Whats would come very interesting is the thing, how your new prez would handle the "homemade things", I mean if he forces your airlines to stop all Airbus orders and lay strictly onto Boeing?

You are delusional or just an Airbus lover despite reality.

The 787 is an amazing plane that had a problem in the beginning, like many new designs. They are well past it. I'm speaking about the viability and demand/profitability of the aircraft. The 787 is absolutely destroying the A380 and the 777X will finish the job. Airlines clearly want 787s...you seen the orders?

The A380 is already seen as a failure. It has made 200 deliveries with another ~100 that may or may not all be filled and they are down to <1 plane/month. This is reality.

The 787 has already made 500 deliveries with another 700 on order today. The 787 is more versatile, efficient, and more comfortable.

The A380 is an amazing plane, but it's not profitable and airlines don't like running them. It was a stupid concept that Boeing released research saying wouldn't work and they were right. Boeing abandoned the "super jumbo" concept and went with a direct to destination approach because it's what people want. Passengers don't want to travel to hubs and change planes to get to their final destination, period.

[The Choosey begger]

Originally Posted by Dang3r

So far so good. And Boeing builds a 787 with dangerous batteries and every modelbuilder had tell them before whats the risks of those mounted ones are. What was the result: A longer forced downtime and the laughter from more experienced engineers

Lets not start to pull more one-armed-bandits than necessary. I'd started with Airbus in the very early 80s on an A300 and had former done some F/E trainings on a 707 and also on the 727. At that time Airbus has had the more future related aircrafts and Boeing had wasted a lot of time with old fashioned things until the 777 came out. Sometimes you make your decision and Im an Airbus man since then. Thats means not Im a Boeing hater, but sometimes they got us scratching our heads and ask "how could they"?

Whats would come very interesting is the thing, how your new prez would handle the "homemade things", I mean if he forces your airlines to stop all Airbus orders and lay strictly onto Boeing?

The A350 also uses Lithium ion batteries.

Yes the 787 ran into problems with the Lithium ion batteries but that's bc they were first and helped perfect it for Airbus to use.

[DDD31]

Hey guys somebody was triggered so no more plane talk.

[gtron]

anglo
BayMoWe335
Dang3r
DDD31

I'm not trying to be mean or anything but you guys are honestly ruining a great thread right now. Please get this thread back on track.

Originally Posted by tc328

Take your plane comments to another thread pls

[Mr Tonka]

Originally Posted by DDD31

Hey guys somebody was triggered so no more plane talk.

How about you at least try and make the plane talk funny.

[Mr Tonka]

Originally Posted by anglo

True

i'm not crazy into aviation, but at least this "plane talk" post is humorous. But then someone got butt hurt over it.... LoLs stopped after that.

[jwzimm]

Originally Posted by Mr Tonka

How about you at least try and make the plane talk funny.

Ok: https://blog.xkcd.com/2008/09/09/the...amn-treadmill/

[The Choosey begger]

.

[ripper0306]

[Dang3r]

;

[Teufel_Hunden]

Originally Posted by anglo

The A350 also uses Lithium ion batteries.

Yes the 787 ran into problems with the Lithium ion batteries but that's bc they were first and helped perfect it for Airbus to use.

Hey, you two are taking the LOL out of the LOL thread. Get funny or get out.