03-18-2011, 10:39 AM | #1 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
shooting sporting events
I'm going to a tourny game this afternoon (two actually). I was wondering how people are shooting decently framed photos without a large telephoto lens? I guess they opt to pay $500+/ticket to get closer seats, but most of us don't have that kind of cash. I have decent seats, but I'm sitting pretty far up. Any suggestions? Or am I basically screwed and should I just take a point-and-shoot and hope for the best?
__________________
|
03-18-2011, 03:52 PM | #2 |
. . .
192
Rep 2,391
Posts |
plan in advance and rent a 300mm f/2.8 for under $100? use a monopod.
lol, do they let you take this kind of equipment in there without a press pass?
__________________
2009 135i | space grey | sport | navi | hifi | heated
dinan stage 2 software | bmw performance exhaust kw v2 | hotchkis front sway | vmr v710 |
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2011, 07:38 PM | #3 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Yeah that would be nice. I decided to risk it and take my tele with me. I got stopped at the security gates. The cop looks at me and smiles and says "seriously?" I said GO BUCKS! He tells me I can go through
I'll post some pics from the game later tonight if I have a chance.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2011, 10:19 PM | #4 |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
which lens?
i take my bag with me just about everywhere with 2 cameras and all my lenses, nobody even looks twice when doing security checks. i do get some funny looks from people when i have my 100-400 attatched to one of my bodies, but i just ignor it and make sure i put it right across their line of site to see if i can get more funny looks (just kidding about the last part) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2011, 10:27 PM | #5 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
They weren't allowing people to bring bags (except purses), inspecting everything, and lenses over 4" weren't allowed on the premises. More and more venues seem to be doing this, which really puts a hamper on things.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2011, 03:02 AM | #6 | |
Bootleggin' 'n Gunrunnin'
148
Rep 2,372
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Scott
2024 G01 X3 M40i, Brooklyn Grey Metallic /// 2015 F15 X5 35i, Space Gray Metallic, 99K miles /// 2013 F30 320xi, Mojave Metallic, 112k miles 2019 Ford F450 STX, Oxford White 2013 Ducati Multistrada Touring S, Red |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2011, 10:41 AM | #7 | |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Quote:
Btw, I did find that Canon made one single telephoto lens under 4" in length: Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Anyone play around with it? Is it worth it?
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2011, 07:30 PM | #9 | |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
Quote:
pro - very light weight, very compact, and pretty decent quality cons - at wide open f-stops, it gets a halo effect on things, and out of focus stuff turns out really round with a bullseye look in the middle of it (like having a light out of focus) solution, shoot at about F8 or higher. aparently the person doing the review liked that subjects getting their pictures taken seemed more comfortable around the smaller lens because it's less imposing. to me, seems like a lot of money for something you can't use at wide F-stops, but on the other hand, it's clearer then most non-L series stuff, and it's very light weight. if you do a lot of sports events with great lighting, go for it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2011, 09:04 PM | #10 |
Banned
651
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2011, 09:50 PM | #11 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
How big was it... about 3"? sounds about right.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2011, 10:07 PM | #12 |
Banned
651
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
..... from the FLOOR!
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2011, 10:09 PM | #13 |
Banned
651
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
no but in all honesty, it was about the same size as the 70-300 IS commonly found today, I was wearing some baggy shorts so they didn't notice. Not really thinking too many security guards eye ball my crotchal region.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2011, 10:18 PM | #14 |
Major General
494
Rep 6,798
Posts |
My problem was that the metal detectors went off. Can't hide a 6" lens in the crotch region when that happens.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2011, 10:20 PM | #15 |
Lieutenant Colonel
512
Rep 1,572
Posts
Drives: 2013 LRP M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Quincy, MA
|
you should check ahead to see if they will let the lens in.. I tried to bring a big lens in to some local games (Canon 70-200)... I found that Celtics and Bruins no DSLR's allowed.. same with Patriots<-- they were the most strict ironically Red Sox, they could care less what you bring in *BUT* the seats are so cramped a 70-200 intruded on some people's personal space..
I did get some $250 seats at Fenway once .. 3 rows back right next to dugout and the 70-200 2.8 IS was stellar.. night game too! best sports pictures I ever took mostly because of the seats. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2011, 10:55 PM | #16 |
Banned
651
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|