BMW i5 and 5-Series Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-27-2010, 06:49 AM   #1
Dec540
Captain
Australia
139
Rep
679
Posts

Drives: G80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia

iTrader: (0)

To L or not to L?

Hey guys,

I'm going to be purchasing a brand new 50D in the near future but can't decide what lens i should get. I'm tossing up between the EF-S 17-55 f2.8 or the 24-70mm L series f2.8. I have read reviews of both and they both sound like awesome lenses.

Pros of the 17-55mm : Its $400 cheaper, its wider (i like doing close ups etc. so the extra 7mm will most likely make a difference.

Cons : It can not be used with a full frame sensor so when i upgrade to a 5D in 18months or so i will have to get a new lens. Apparently the L's are weather sealed but the 17-55 is not.

Any other pros/cons? Any recommendations? I've been thinking I'm best off buying a lens for the camera I'm buying now and not the one i may buy in the future
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 08:13 AM   #2
radiantm3
Apex Everything!
radiantm3's Avatar
United_States
1007
Rep
4,378
Posts

Drives: 2007 Honda S2000, 2017 GT350
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cedar Park, TX

iTrader: (6)

Garage List
2011 E92 M3  [9.35]
2014 BMW i3  [10.00]
EF-S is designed for a crop camera so comparing a EF-S @ 17mm and EF @ 24mm is a bigger difference than you think. It's not just a 7mm difference on a crop camera.

L lenses are (generally) going to be sharper, provide a much better image quality, bokeh, and better colors. After you own an L lens, you won't want to buy anything else. That could be a con. :P

However, if you need something wider, then you might not have much choice. I bought the EF-S 10-22mm back when I had a crop. I was in the same scenario as you (only I wanted an ultra-wide). I wanted to get the L ultra-wide, but knew it wouldn't be wide enough on a crop camera. So I just went with the EF-S. Used it for a year and sold it when I moved to full frame. Lenses hold their value fairly well as long as you take care of them.

Another option for you is possibly going with the 16-35mm/2.8 L? That could be wide enough for your needs on a crop for now and will be a must-have lens once you go full frame.
__________________
2011 E92 M3(Sold). 2007 Honda S2000 (Track Car). 2016 Cayman GT4 (Sold). 2017 Shelby GT350 (AKA Crowd Killer).

My pet project: https://stickershift.com
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 09:16 AM   #3
Derek Zoolander
Banned
United_States
97
Rep
1,873
Posts

Drives: 09 E90 M-Sport
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashua, NH

iTrader: (0)

L if you can afford it.
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 09:27 AM   #4
888
I'm takin' the day off.
888's Avatar
South Africa
111
Rep
339
Posts

Drives: M
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

as per radiantm3,

go for what is best for your needs now. if you get the 17-55 you will be able to sell both. If cash is tight consider a secondhand 40D. 18 months is a long time in the photography world. the 17-55 is basically an L just without the red ring.
__________________
If I were to agree with you we would both be wrong.
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 11:14 AM   #5
remmib
General
remmib's Avatar
Norway
1586
Rep
29,215
Posts

Drives: 2013 F10 520d M-Sport
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

If you're only going for one lens, go with the 17-55, because the 24-70 is not wide enough on a crop body, so you need a second wide lens like the 10-22.
__________________

F10 520d M-Sport Alpine White | HRE P43SC 20x9+20x11 | Michelin PSS 255/35+295/30 | KW V3 Coilover | M5 Front Sway Bar + M550d Rear Sway Bar | 3DDesign Front Lip | BMW M Performance CF Spoiler | BMW M Performance Diffuser | BMW M Performance Black Grills | BMW M Performance Pedals |
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 11:19 AM   #6
vachss
Captain
56
Rep
816
Posts

Drives: Z4 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (1)

The 17-55/2.8 is widely regarded as the best zoom lens in the EF-S system. While its build quality isn't up to L standards its optical quality certainly is. The EF-S system isn't going anywhere, and if you go full frame you'll find it easy enough to sell the 17-55.

My advice would be to find one used for about $800-850. When/if you need to sell it you'll be able to turn it around with minimal loss.
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 11:20 AM   #7
E92NV
Second Lieutenant
12
Rep
283
Posts

Drives: E92 alpine white
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long island NY

iTrader: (2)

I would get the 24-70. I had the 17-40 and I just sold it bc i needed more reach instead of the wideness.
__________________

wtb: tial bov w charge pipe, Injen intake
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 01:05 PM   #8
ichiban
Colonel
ichiban's Avatar
102
Rep
2,012
Posts

Drives: 08 135i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (2)

I'd say if your planning on going to FF in 18 months, i'd still say you should pick up the 17-55 2.8 IS because of the 3 stop IS, it's a very sharp lens and a lot of pro photogs keep a crop body with them just so they can use this lens. I think during the 18 months, the 17-55 is a better focal range for you to develop your photographic eye and reflexes which i think is more important than gear. And besides, the 17-55 2.8 IS keeps it's value very well and there doesn't seem to be a successor in line unlike the 24-70 L which is due for mark II.

IMO, buy a used 17-55 2.8 IS, and sell it to fund for a 24-70L when you go FF.
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 01:05 PM   #9
PNF
Colonel
PNF's Avatar
Taiwan
175
Rep
2,355
Posts

Drives: 15' YMB F80 M3
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wayne, PA / Taipei

iTrader: (4)

umm.. 17-55mm f2.8 is just as sharp as the 24-70L. 17-55mm also has IS, while 24-70L does not. It makes a difference if you do a lot of indoor shooting or your hand isnt exactly steady.

The only real downside of 17-55mm is, IMO, it is not FF capable and it is not L. Weather-sealed or not, that doesnt really make a big difference unless you shoot in extreme conditions often (say in desert most of the time, in extreme cold or hot weather, etc).

24-70mm is not even close to wide enough if you use that as your only lens and walk around lens.

OR get this

16-35L MKII. its wide enough, its a L, its sharp.


In Summary, 17-55mm IS USM is certainly built like a L and performs like a L.

PS. You're getting a 50D? I might be considering selling mine. (in excellent condition and still have all original box/manual/everything). Have used this for about 9 months now.

PM me if you're interested.
__________________
2015 F80 Fully loaded (minus the CCB) YMB M3 / Individual Amaro Brown
BBS | KW | Vorsteiner | IND | Akrapovic | BMW CF Performance Interior | Brembo | Eibach

2008 E92 335i (sold)
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 01:06 PM   #10
PNF
Colonel
PNF's Avatar
Taiwan
175
Rep
2,355
Posts

Drives: 15' YMB F80 M3
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wayne, PA / Taipei

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ichiban View Post
I'd say if your planning on going to FF in 18 months, i'd still say you should pick up the 17-55 2.8 IS because of the 3 stop IS, it's a very sharp lens and a lot of pro photogs keep a crop body with them just so they can use this lens. I think during the 18 months, the 17-55 is a better focal range for you to develop your photographic eye and reflexes which i think is more important than gear. And besides, the 17-55 2.8 IS keeps it's value very well and there doesn't seem to be a successor in line unlike the 24-70 L which is due for mark II.

IMO, buy a used 17-55 2.8 IS, and sell it to fund for a 24-70L when you go FF.
+1
__________________
2015 F80 Fully loaded (minus the CCB) YMB M3 / Individual Amaro Brown
BBS | KW | Vorsteiner | IND | Akrapovic | BMW CF Performance Interior | Brembo | Eibach

2008 E92 335i (sold)
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 01:06 PM   #11
bosstones
Lieutenant Colonel
1249
Rep
1,600
Posts

Drives: o_0
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Suburbia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by remmib View Post
If you're only going for one lens, go with the 17-55, because the 24-70 is not wide enough on a crop body, so you need a second wide lens like the 10-22.
+1. I have a crop cam and ended up with 2 lens in both those focal ranges. I started off with the 24-70 and needed something wider. Love the 10-22, though.

Depends on what you tend to shoot, though (obviously). I only take occassional telephoto/zoom shots so I just suffer without. 90+% of my pix are close or require something wide so I'm a little biased...
__________________
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2010, 10:32 PM   #12
Dr_Jones
Major
75
Rep
1,027
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: May 2008

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 888 View Post
as per radiantm3,

go for what is best for your needs now. if you get the 17-55 you will be able to sell both. If cash is tight consider a secondhand 40D. 18 months is a long time in the photography world. the 17-55 is basically an L just without the red ring.

i want something fast in this range. What a horrible hobby.

I went the second hand 40D route. great camera...probably too much for my hands. but i would say 'give a 50d a hard look' as i think the prices are better than when i purchased courtesy of 7d and you may be able to get another stop of useable ISO.

17-55 FTMFW
__________________
Just like Indiana...I love my whip

Appreciate 0
      01-28-2010, 05:07 AM   #13
ichiban
Colonel
ichiban's Avatar
102
Rep
2,012
Posts

Drives: 08 135i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (2)

As a matter of fact, I have a LN 50D for 850 and it comes with canon grip, extra battery and has every that came with it brand new except for the box. I do have the box for the battery grip tho. Let me know if your interested. I can take some pictures as well.
Appreciate 0
      01-28-2010, 06:32 AM   #14
Dec540
Captain
Australia
139
Rep
679
Posts

Drives: G80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia

iTrader: (0)

Thanks guys, some very valid points. I think i will be going for the 17-55 as its got the IS and because it has a much for usable focal range for my style of photography.

PNF - I have just purchased wheels for my car so it looks like it will be at least another month until i have some spare cash for a camera. That and being in Australia i figure i'm better off buying one over here so i have the warranty etc.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.




g60
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST