08-15-2008, 04:30 PM | #23 |
this is the way
20178
Rep 8,978
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2008, 07:07 PM | #27 |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,455
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2008, 07:46 PM | #28 |
this is the way
20178
Rep 8,978
Posts |
Again, you use your personal perception as a valid reason to disprove the video. And again you contradict your original argument and have yet to show any real proof. As far as saying that I am arguing it's real... I don't even know what you're talking about. I already said that it looked real to me but that doesn't mean it is. Maybe you should go back and reread the thread before you accuse me of saying something I did not...
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2008, 07:57 PM | #29 | |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,455
Posts |
Quote:
exactly how am i contradicting my original argument? What proof is needed other than the fact that the video is an ad? That pretty much inequivocally prevents the video from being real. Once I get home and can access the arnette website i will post it (assuming that claim was true). Couple that with the fact that it is glaring obvious the video is staged, and you have a pretty bulletproof argument. And no, this is not personal perception; the differences between viral marketing and actual real life events taking place on film are in no way mistakeable for one another. Claiming the video "looks" real is essentially saying you cant tell the difference between the two. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|