Quote:
Originally Posted by bmwmike335
please explain your logic. how does the OP being in possession of a loaded and concealed firearm help this situation.
are you saying that because he had a loaded firearm then his ego would be much stronger and he would have handled this situation more like a man (not saying OP didn't)
or are you saying that if he had the firearm then it would have made things better because he would have shot the man in a wife beater walking up to his car?
i don't see how CCW license would help anybody in this situation.
Even if he did get carjacked... be honest with yourself, would you shoot a man for stealing you car? would you be that sure of yourself that shooting this man would also be justified in front of a jury filled with morons when the prosecutors try to slam a involuntary manslaughter on you due to wanton disregard for life? the jury will look at your case and think your a hot headed lunatic for killing a man for a piece of metal (granted an 80K piece of metal lol) but still... and, if you do get popped with that felony, or perhaps a lower conviction of some other assault crime (if said person happened to take a plea bargain) then you could kiss your CCW license goodbye because in CA if you have previous felony or assault convictions you can't purchase or possess a firearm... so you'd be right back to where you were...with no gun at all except the one between your legs. =)
don't want to pick a fight, but just need to clarify and give the other side in case theres 15 16 year old kids in here reading this shit thinking its cool to walk around with a gun and shoot a guy on the freeway due to plain old unexpected fear of "what happens now".
|
If he is legally carrying, and the guy in the original post put fear of serious injury or death, he has a right to use deadly force. If the potential car-jacker was armed, that would warrant the aforementioned fear of death and the OP having a gun would be beneficial.